![]() |
|
#21
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
N'Vasion Paintball | T-1 Project | MR1 Project | Feedback (+30,-0) | PBN Feedback (+34,-0) | Myspace | Better Sniping 101 Quote:
|
|
#22
|
||||
|
||||
|
i like the dent. my question is, how will they make the dm8 better than it?
|
|
#23
|
||||
|
||||
|
The hyper 3 is supposedly designed with a new architecture and put in a smaller package. I've heard it used springs rather than disks, but no confirmed reports of this.
a few questions I have are: is the ul trigger still sucky? where is the LPR at? will the dm8 have that annoying on/off My predictions for Dm8 differences are: self cleaning eyes different layout more expensive |
|
#24
|
||||
|
||||
|
The "dent" is a little awkward...but it is still a Dye product.... HOT! Can't wait to see them!
__________________
Custom red anno Proto PM6 w/ UL frame, Lucky board w/ red eyes, CCM feedneck w/ Sundragon lever-lock Dust black Dye DM7 w/ Virtue board, blue laser eyes, CP flow plug, CP rake trigger |
|
#25
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
something to do.... |
|
#26
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Quote:
It looks like there are only two places it can be - if it's actually vertical as I've heard. Either located within the "dent" on top of the reg (remember, it's supposed to be a smaller LPR) or underneath through the frame itself. Orrrrrr, if there actually ISN'T an LPR, I'd like to point out that I predicted that way back when I reviewed the PMR and I'm now snickering at the people who made fun of the LPR'less Matrix. I bet it has some sort of on/off - not sure which one, though. I would bet they stay with the self-cleaning eyes, not sure of the layout, but definitely more expensive!
__________________
Pressing on
Never argue with an idiot; they'll drag you down to their level and beat you with experience." ~ Anonymous |
|
#27
|
||||
|
||||
|
I've seen a pic of the DM8, but its got a Hyper 2 reg on it, so I don't know if I should believe it or not. The body milling is awesome though, so I kinda hope that part is correct.
__________________
HK Quote:
|
|
#28
|
||||
|
||||
|
DM6 UL trigger is one of the worst I've ever felt.
Problems I have with it are: -Spring Tension point isn't fast without the pull being heavy -Removing the spring makes it too floppy -Trigger Activation point sucks for close riding trigger setup -The angle it sets up at doesn't feel right on the UL frame -releasing pointer during a tighter walk shooting posture requires a longer pull to get it off the activation point so you middle can hit. -Wobbly |
|
#29
|
||||
|
||||
|
I can agree with all of Claus's points when I had my Shocktech DM5 with a UL frame, but the trigger on my DM7 felt great. Dunno if there were changes, or if it was how it was setup, but it was great.
__________________
HK Quote:
|
|
#30
|
||||
|
||||
|
Hmmm, never held a DM6 UL frame before so I can't say, but I know my PMR UL trigger is none of those things. Spring tension is perfect (for me - I can rip like no other), I feel no need to remove the spring whatsoever, the activation point is very similar to my Shocker activiation point so it feels good to me, angle? It's comfortable to me - almost straight up and down, with the bottom the exact distance needed and not to much of an angle, and my trigger isn't wobbly whatsoever.
I guess it's mainly a feel and opinion because I disagree. Or maybe the DM6 UL is just a crappy version...I dunno.
__________________
Pressing on
Never argue with an idiot; they'll drag you down to their level and beat you with experience." ~ Anonymous |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|