Lol! OK, now I have a question for both Sandman and
Schecter. This isn't to start a fight, I'm just curious on both of your takes on it, so don't take it as a reason to.
If a child and an adult human (lets say male in both cases) have the same structure in respective sizes, then wouldn't the hit hurt the child more? Even though they are RESPECTIVELY the same via scale, the child would have less "padding," per se with my train of thought, as the "padding" would be smaller and not as thick as that of the adult.
Now the question I have is, would that train of thought be right? No debating... just what you think of this post.
(Yeah, I'm curious, I just don't want another spat...)