![]() |
G-MAX Shocker
He's a local at my town, so gonna post it up here too
Original Post at PBNation: http://www.pbnation.com/showthread.php?t=1303377 Quote:
|
Re: G-MAX Shocker
gmax on the side sucks, timmy dents, and ccm reg, needs a no-pro feed. thats why i dont like it.
|
Re: G-MAX Shocker
I had the same reg and feedneck, I loved them. I like the look of it. And the Rip frame is nice.
|
Re: G-MAX Shocker
Body doesnt do it for me, it reminds me of a person that would be sponsored by like..Wal-Mart or something..lol
|
Re: G-MAX Shocker
Quote:
|
Re: G-MAX Shocker
the hole to the firing chamber is way to big, youd need a turbo bolt from sp or an open body from newdesignz and neither of those have as good of flow as the closed body bolts and the half and half for stock bodies
|
Re: G-MAX Shocker
I don't know. From all the hype on PBN about it, I expected something A LOT better. Looks like a plastic body for the shocker!
But, before passing judgment, I'd have to see one in person first. |
Re: G-MAX Shocker
look at the body vike, its maybe 1 millimeter from the bolt, that'll be incredibly light. and it isnt plastic, its dust black anno... the gmax on the side is really corny tho
|
Re: G-MAX Shocker
No, that's not what I said. I said it looks like a plastic body, not that it was one. As far as lightness goes, meh.....the shocker is already lighter than most so why make it lighter? Also, the thinner the body, the easier to dent making it inoperable.
Still reserving judgment....I do like the Hybrid one better, though. |
Re: G-MAX Shocker
hybrid is all looks, and it doesnt look great. this is slimer, and lighter. the frame is apperently an ounce lighter than stock (which is lighter than the hybrid) the body has to have atleast 4 ounces cut from it (where as the hybrid has that 4 plus 3 more) and third, it doesnt have that ugly hybrid bolt guide.
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:53 AM. |